Apple Backs US Government's Push for a National Right-to-Repair Bill . (But What About Parts Pairing?)

An anonymous reader shared this report from Ars Technica:
Following the passage of California's repair bill that Apple supported, requiring seven years of parts, specialty tools, and repair manual availability, Apple announced Tuesday that it would back a similar bill on a federal level. It would also make its parts, tools, and repair documentation available to both non-affiliated repair shops and individual customers, 'at fair and reasonable prices.'

'We intend to honor California's new repair provisions across the United States,' said Brian Naumann, Apple's vice president for service and operation management, at a White House event Tuesday...

'I think most OEMs [Original Equipment Manufacturers] will realize they can save themselves a lot of trouble by making parts, tools, and other requirements of state laws already in NY, MN, CA, and CO available nationally,' wrote Gay Gordon-Byrne, executive director of The Repair Association, to Ars... Gordon-Byrne noted that firms like HP, Google, Samsung, and Lenovo have pledged to comply with repair rules on a national level. The US Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) communicated a similarly hopeful note in its response to Tuesday's event, noting that 'Apple makes a lot of products, and its conduct definitely influences other manufacturers.' At the same time, numerous obstacles to repair access remain in place through copyright law — 'Which we hope will be high on an agenda in the IP subcommittee this session,' Gordon-Byrne wrote.
Besides strong support from President Biden, there's also strong support from America's Federal Trade Commission, reports TechCrunch:

FTC chair Lina Khan commented on the pushback many corporations have given such legislation. Device and automotive manufacturers have argued that putting such choice in the hands of consumers opens them up to additional security risks. 'We hear some manufacturers defend repair restrictions, claiming that they're needed for safety or security reasons,' said Khan. 'The FTC has found that all too often these claims are backed by limited evidence. Accordingly, the FTC has committed itself to using all of our enforcement and policy tools to fight for people's right to repair their own products.'

A cautionary note from Ars Technica:
Elizabeth Chamberlain, director of sustainability for iFixit, a parts vendor and repair advocate, suggested that Apple's pledge to extend California's law on a national level is 'a strategic move.' 'Apple likely hopes that they will be able to negotiate out the parts of the Minnesota bill they don't like,' Chamberlain wrote in an email, pointing specifically to the 'fair and reasonable' parts provisioning measure that could preclude Apple's tendency toward pairing parts to individual devices. '[I]t's vital to get bulletproof parts pairing prohibitions passed in other states in 2024,' Chamberlain wrote. 'Independent repair and refurbishment depend on parts harvesting.'

The Washington Post reports that currently repair shop owners and parts vendors 'have had to find ways to reassure their customers they haven't made a mistake by choosing an independent fix.'

If the digital identifier tied to a replacement part doesn't match the one the phone expects to see, you'll start seeing those warnings and issues. 'Only Apple pairs parts in an intrusive way where you get these messages pop up,' said Jonathan Strange, owner of two XiRepair gadget repair shops in Montgomery, Alabama. To ward off those unnerving messages and restore full functionality, repair technicians are required to go through a 'system configuration' process that authenticates the part after making the fix. Some small operations, like Strange's XiRepair shops, can do that in-store because they've gone through a process to become a certified Apple Independent Repair Providers. But that process can't happen at all in shops that haven't gone through that certification, or if more affordable parts like third-party replacements were used.
The Post also shares this reaction from Aaron Perzanowski, a repair researcher and law professor at the University of Michigan.

'The fact that companies want to use technology to essentially undo the notion of interchangeable parts is something we ought to find deeply disturbing.'

Read more of this story at Slashdot.