Navigation
Search
|
Implementing predictive monitoring with AIOps
Monday October 20, 2025. 11:40 AM , from InfoWorld
Artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) has become a hot topic, often described as the future of IT resilience. However, a lot of discussions end at the strategy level without going into specifics about how to really construct it. The real value of AIOps comes from implementing predictive monitoring that integrates with existing enterprise monitoring stacks, applies machine learning to operational data and automates both analysis and response.
This article provides a deep dive into those mechanics: Integrating AIOps with enterprise monitoring tools, building ML models that learn from system logs and telemetry and automating alert correlation for faster root cause analysis. Along the way, we’ll explore data streaming pipelines, anomaly detection models and the automation frameworks that make predictive monitoring actionable. Integrating AIOps with enterprise monitoring tools The majority of businesses currently have an ecosystem of robust monitoring tools, such as Dynatrace or AppDynamics for application performance, Splunk or ELK for logs and Prometheus for metrics. The good news? None of them is replaced by AIOps. It stretches them out. Here’s how that happens under the hood: Event ingestion: Use connectors or agents to stream data into an AIOps platform from your current tools, such as logs, metrics and traces. Normalization: Construct a single schema that machine learning algorithms can comprehend by combining these disparate formats. Context enrichment: To aid the system in comprehending relationships and impact, include additional metadata such as topology or service ownership. By making your current tools smarter and more connected, this configuration guarantees that your AIOps layer doesn’t create anything from scratch. Building ML models that learn from system logs and telemetry The effectiveness of predictive monitoring depends on the caliber of its machine learning models. These models look for early indicators of danger by analyzing traces, logs and telemetry.Typically, your primary data sources consist of: Logs: Security events, application problems and system notifications. Telemetry: Measures such as network, disk, CPU and memory usage. Traces: Information about delay and service dependencies from dispersed systems. After the data is in, you can use a variety of machine learning techniques: Forecast trends and identify anomalous spikes before they affect consumers via time-series forecasting (LSTM, Prophet). Unsupervised learning (DBSCAN, Isolation Forest): Find novel or unidentified irregularities in system patterns. Classify recurring occurrences using supervised models (SVM, Random Forest) to expedite triage. A few recommended practices are crucial: continuously retrain models to accommodate new workloads, validate them with labeled occurrences to reduce false positives and take into account ensemble approaches that strike a compromise between recall and precision. Automating alert correlation and root cause analysis The agony of alert storms, hundreds of notifications brought on by a single underlying failure, is well known to all operations engineers. That noise is reduced with the aid of AIOps. Here’s how: Clustering is the process of combining related alarms (such as sluggish queries on the same host, CPU spikes and packet loss). Cross-domain association: For a comprehensive end-to-end perspective, link application behavior to infrastructure measurements. Root cause recommendations: To determine which component is actually failing, use service dependency graphs. For example, instead of bombarding your team with redundant, independent notifications, the AIOps engine may automatically combine alerts that show frequent I/O problems and growing disc latency to a failing storage volume. Streaming data from hybrid cloud workloads Monitoring is more difficult in hybrid cloud settings, which are partially on-premises and partially in the cloud. Reliable data pipelines that manage all workloads consistently are necessary for AIOps to be effective.That’s possible with: Agents: Programs for gathering logs, such as Fluentd, Filebeat or CloudWatch agents. Event buses: Pulsar or Kafka for real-time movement of large amounts of telemetry. Storage layers: Time-series databases or object storage for training historical models. When properly implemented, your AIOps system will have a single view of both legacy and cloud-native systems, which is essential for identifying problems that cut across infrastructure boundaries. Automation frameworks for remediation Analysis and detection are excellent, but predictive monitoring is only effective when it results in action. Frameworks for automation can help with that: Runbook automation: When a known anomaly arises, programs can be automatically executed using tools such as Rundeck or Ansible. Self-healing systems: Platforms like as Kubernetes can restart failing services, auto-scale nodes and reschedule pods. Closed-loop automation: Without human involvement, the AIOps process can move from anomaly detection to correlation, remediation and validation. As a real-world example, an AIOps model finds a Java microservice memory leak. It restarts the Kubernetes container, correlates related alerts, pinpoints the precise service and sends a Slack confirmation message. An automatic solution to the problem. Pitfalls and challenges AIOps isn’t magic, of course. There are a few things to be aware of: False positives: Inaccurately calibrated models may provide noise rather than insight. Complexity of integration: Combining several tools and clouds requires preparation and perseverance. Trust in automation: Teams must validate automated responses before granting full autonomy. AIOps…not just a buzzword Only when AIOps is applied with technical depth and not just as a catchphrase can it offer true value. You can move from firefighting to foresight by integrating with your current monitoring stack, automating alarm correlation and remediation and utilizing machine learning models that learn from logs and telemetry. AIOps-powered predictive monitoring isn’t some far-off ideal for engineers, architects and IT executives; rather, it’s a collection of implementable frameworks and patterns that can make your operations proactive, robust and scalable right now. This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.Want to join?
https://www.infoworld.com/article/4075057/implementing-predictive-monitoring-with-aiops.html
|
25 sources
Current Date
Oct, Wed 22 - 22:58 CEST
|