MacMusic  |  PcMusic  |  440 Software  |  440 Forums  |  440TV  |  Zicos
nasa
Search

Elon Musk: 'We're Going Straight to Mars. The Moon is a Distraction.'

Sunday January 5, 2025. 06:34 PM , from Slashdot
Elon Musk: 'We're Going Straight to Mars.  The Moon is a Distraction.'
'We're going straight to Mars. The Moon is a distraction,' Elon Musk posted Thursday on X.com.

Ars Technica's senior space editor points out that 'These are definitive statements that directly contradict NASA's plans to send a series of human missions to the lunar south pole later this decade and establish a sustainable base of operations there with the Artemis Program.' And 'It would be one thing if Musk was just expressing his opinion as a private citizen...' but Musk 'has assumed an important advisory role for the incoming administration. He was also partly responsible for the expected nomination of private astronaut [and former SpaceX flight commander] Jared Isaacman to become the next administrator of NASA. Although Musk is not directing US space policy, he certainly has a meaningful say in what happens.'

So what does this mean for Artemis? The fate of Artemis is an important question not just for NASA but for the US commercial space industry, the European Space Agency, and other international partners who have aligned with the return of humans to the Moon. With Artemis, the United States is in competition with China to establish a meaningful presence on the surface of the Moon. Based upon conversations with people involved in developing space policy for the Trump administration, I can make some educated guesses about how to interpret Musk's comments. None of these people, for example, would disagree with Musk's assertion that 'the Artemis architecture is extremely inefficient' and that some changes are warranted.

With that said, the Artemis Program is probably not going away. After all, it was the first Trump administration that created the program about five years ago. However, it may be less well-remembered that the first Trump White House pushed for more significant changes, including a 'major course correction' at NASA... To a large extent, NASA resisted this change during the remainder of the Trump administration, keeping its core group of major contractors, such as Boeing and Lockheed Martin, in place. It had help from key US Senators, including Richard Shelby, the now-retired Republican from Alabama. But this time, the push for change is likely to be more concerted, especially with key elements of NASA's architecture, including the Space Launch System rocket, being bypassed by privately developed rockets such as SpaceX's Starship vehicle and Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket.

In all likelihood, NASA will adopt a new 'Artemis' plan that involves initiatives to both the Moon and Mars. When Musk said 'we're going straight to Mars,' he may have meant that this will be the thrust of SpaceX, with support from NASA. That does not preclude a separate initiative, possibly led by Blue Origin with help from NASA, to develop lunar return plans.
One month ago in a post on X.com, incoming NASA administrator Isaacman described himself as 'passionate about America leading the most incredible adventure in human history...'

And he also added that Americans 'will walk on the Moon and Mars and in doing so, we will make life better here on Earth.'

Read more of this story at Slashdot.
https://science.slashdot.org/story/25/01/04/201255/elon-musk-were-going-straight-to-mars-the-moon-is...

Related News

News copyright owned by their original publishers | Copyright © 2004 - 2025 Zicos / 440Network
Current Date
Jan, Tue 7 - 17:15 CET