Will a US Supreme Court Ruling Put Net Neutrality at Risk?

Today the Wall Street Journal reported that restoring net neutrality to America is 'on shakier legal footing after a Supreme Court decision on Friday shifted power away from federal agencies.'

'It's hard to overstate the impact that this ruling could have on the regulatory landscape in the United States going forward,' said Leah Malone, a lawyer at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. 'This could really bind U.S. agencies in their efforts to write new rules.' Now that [the 'Chevron deference'] is gone, the Federal Communications Commission is expected to have a harder time reviving net neutrality — a set of policies barring internet-service providers from assigning priority to certain web traffic...

The Federal Communications Commission reclassified internet providers as public utilities under the Communications Act. There are pending court cases challenging the FCC's reinterpretation of that 1934 law, and the demise of Chevron deference heightens the odds of the agency losing in court, some legal experts said. 'Chevron's thumb on the scale in favor of the agencies was crucial to their chances of success,' said Geoffrey Manne, president of the International Center for Law and Economics. 'Now that that's gone, their claims are significantly weaker.'
Other federal agencies could also be affected, according to the article. The ruling could also make it harder for America's Environmental Protection Agency to crack down on power-plant pollution. And the Federal Trade Commission face more trouble in court defending its recent ban on noncompete agreements. Lawyer Daniel Jarcho tells the Journal that the Court's decision 'will unquestionably lead to more litigation challenging federal agency actions, and more losses for federal agencies.'

Friday a White House press secretary issued a statement calling the court's decision 'deeply troubling,' and arguing that the court had 'decided in the favor of special interests'.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.