Google Defends 'Better' Search Product as Antitrust Trial Concludes

Google is making its last attempt to fight back against a historic effort by the US Department of Justice to break the tech giant's grip on online search, as the most significant antitrust trial in 25 years comes to a close in Washington. From a report: A federal court in Washington began hearing closing arguments on Thursday after a 10-week trial in which the DoJ accused Alphabet, the parent company of Google, of suppressing search rivals by paying tens of billions annually for anti-competitive agreements with wireless carriers, browser developers and device manufacturers. During the hearing on Thursday, John Schmidtlein, a lawyer from Williams & Connolly representing Google, sought to push back on claims that it had hindered rivals' efforts to gain a foothold in online search, and argued that users had plenty of alternatives.

Unsealed court documents revealed this week that Alphabet paid Apple $20bn in 2022 alone to be the default search engine for its iPhone and Safari browser on its other devices. 'Google winning agreements because it has a better product is not a harm to the competitive process, even if it gives it scale to improve its product,' Schmidtlein told the court. A lawyer for the government, Kenneth Dintzer, told the court that Google's 'anti-competitive conduct harms competition and is self perpetuating.' Defaults 'are a powerful way to drive searches, otherwise Google wouldn't pay billions of dollars for them,' he added.

Amit Mehta, the judge hearing the case, noted that search 'today looks a lot different than it didâ 10 to 15 years ago. He pushed back on the DoJ's contention that the quality of search had suffered due to the lack of competition, although he also noted that only two 'substantial competitors' had entered the search market in the past decade. 'Doesn't that tell us all we need to know in terms of barriers of entry,' he asked.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.