Linus Torvalds Has 'Robust Exchanges' Over Filesystem Suggestion on Linux Kernel Mailing List

Linus Torvalds had 'some robust exchanges' on the Linux kernel mailing list with a contributor from Google. The subject was inodes, notes the Register, 'which as Red Hat puts it are each 'a unique identifier for a specific piece of metadata on a given filesystem.''

Inodes have been the subject of debate on the Linux Kernel Mailing list for the last couple of weeks, with Googler Steven Rostedt and Torvalds engaging in some robust exchanges on the matter. In a thread titled, 'Have the inodes all for files and directories all be the same,' posters noted that inodes may still have a role when using tar to archive files. Torvalds countered that inodes have had their day. 'Yes, inode numbers used to be special, and there's history behind it. But we should basically try very hard to walk away from that broken history,' he wrote. 'An inode number just isn't a unique descriptor any more. We're not living in the 1970s, and filesystems have changed.' But debate on inodes continued. Rostedt eventually suggested that inodes should all have unique numbers...

In response... Torvalds opened: 'Stop making things more complicated than they need to be.' Then he got a bit shouty. 'And dammit, STOP COPYING VFS LAYER FUNCTIONS. It was a bad idea last time, it's a horribly bad idea this time too. I'm not taking this kind of crap.' Torvalds's main criticism of Rostedt's approach is that the Google dev didn't fully understand the subject matter — which Rostedt later acknowledged.

'An inode number just isn't a unique descriptor any more,' Torvalds wrote at one point.

'We're not living in the 1970s, and filesystems have changed.'

Read more of this story at Slashdot.