Are We Headed to a Future With Autonomous Robot Soldiers?

A CBS News video reports the U.S. military 'is now testing an autonomous F-16 fighter jet, and in simulated dogfighting, the AI already crushes trained human pilots.' And that's just one of several automated systems being developed — raising questions as to just how far this technology should go:
'The people we met developing these systems say they aren't trying to replace humans, just make their jobs safer. But a shift to robot soldiers could change war in profound ways, as we found on a visit to Sikorsky Aircraft, the military contractor that makes the Blackhawk helicopter... Flying the experimental Blackhawk is as easy as moving a map.' [The experimental helicopter is literally controlled by taps on a tablet computer, says a representative from Sikorsky. 'We call it operating, because you're making suggestions. The machine really decides how to do it.']
The Sikorsky representative suggests it could avoid a 'Blackhawk down' scenario where more human soldiers have to be sent into harm's way to try rescuing their comrades. But CBS also calls it 'part of a larger effort to change how wars are fought, being led by DARPA, the Defense Department's innovative lab. They've also developed autonomous offroad buggies, unmanned undersea vehicles, and swarms and swarms of drones.'

The CBS reporter then asks DARPA program manager Stuart Young if we're head for the future with Terminator-like fighting machines. His answer? 'There's always those dilemmas that we have, but clearly our adversaries are thinking about that thing. And part of what DARPA does is to try to prevent technologial surprise.'

CBS also spoke to former Army Ranger Paul Scharre, who later worked for the Defense Department on autonomous weapons, who says already-available comercial technologies could create autonomous weapons today. 'All it takes is a few lines of code to simply take the human out of the loop.'
'Scharre is not all doom and gloom. He points out in combat between nations, robot soldiers will legally need to follow the law of war, and might do so better than emotional or fatigued humans... But yes, Scharre does worry about the eventual marriage of advanced robots and military AI that becomes smarter and faster than we are.'
Q: So at that point humans just would be out of the decision-making. You'd just have to trust the machines and that you'd programmed them well.
A: Yes...
Q: Do you think militaries should commit to keeping humans in the loop?
A: I don't think that's viable. If you could wave a magic wand and say, 'We're going to stop the growth of the technology', there's probably benefits in that. But I don't think it's viable today... A human looking at a target, saying 'Yep, that's a viable target,' pressing a button every single time? That would be ideal. I'm not sure that's going to be the case.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.