Former Facebook Employees Say The Company's Prioritization Of Privacy is About Optics

Last May, Facebook promised to launch a 'Clear History' feature that it said would give users more control over their data. 9 months later it's nowhere to be found and now a report claims that it's a key example of the company's 'reactionary' way of dealing with privacy concerns. From a report: Thus far, Facebook's public discussions of Clear History appear to have been more about communications strategy than charting a new course. In a Facebook post looking back on 2018, Zuckerberg pointed to the tool as one that would 'give people more transparency' while Sandberg highlighted it to show Facebook's willingness to change during a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, last month.

Still, nine months after its initial announcement, Clear History is nowhere to be found. 'We want to make sure this works the way it should for everyone on Facebook, which is taking longer than expected,' the company said in a statement to BuzzFeed News. It's unclear if new high-profile hires, like Nate Cardozo (formerly of EFF) and Robyn Greene (formerly of New America's Open Technology Institute), will work with Facebook's new privacy unit or if they will be involved with Clear History. It has reached out to groups like Access Now, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), as well as academics.

Sources confirmed that CDT and EFF were advising Facebook on its Clear History tool, but could not disclose specifics of their meetings due to nondisclosure agreements. Access Now's Masse confirmed Facebook had reached out on a number of issues, including Clear History, in the last few months, but called the conversations 'punctual and limited.' 'Despite repeated statements and apologies from the company, we are not seeing a shift in Facebook data practices or an attitude that would suggest that they take data protection seriously,' she said.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.