Those Opposed To Scientific Consensus Bolstered By 'Illusion of Knowledge'

The Edmonton Journal reports:
Recently, researchers asked more than 2,000 American and European adults their thoughts about genetically modified foods. They also asked them how much they thought they understood about GM foods, and a series of 15 true-false questions to test how much they actually knew about genetics and science in general. The researchers were interested in studying a perverse human phenomenon: People tend to be lousy judges of how much they know. Across four studies conducted in three countries -- the U.S., France and Germany -- the researchers found that extreme opponents of genetically modified foods 'display a lack of insight into how much they know.' They know the least, but think they know the most. 'The less people know,' the authors conclude, 'the more opposed they are to the scientific consensus.'
Science communicators have made concerted efforts to educate the public with an eye to bringing their attitudes in line with the experts,' they write in the journal Nature Human Behaviour. But people with an inflated sense of what they actually know -- and most in need of education -- are also the ones least likely to be open to new information.... Extreme views often come along with not appreciating the complexity of the subject -- 'not realizing how much there is to know,' said Philip Fernbach, lead author of the new study and a professor of marketing at the University of Colorado Boulder. 'People who don't know very much think they know a lot, and that is the basis for their extreme views.'
Slashdot reader Layzej links to Rational Wiki's article on 'The Backfire Effect,' to illustrate Fernbach's observation that 'People double down on their 'counter-scientific consensus attitudes'.
'Epecially when people feel threatened or if they are being treated as if they are stupid.'

Read more of this story at Slashdot.