What Happened After Matt Taibbi Revealed Twitter's Deliberations on Hunter Biden Tweets?

'Twitter CEO Elon Musk turned to journalist Matt Taibbi on Friday to reveal the decision-making behind the platform's suppression of a 2020 article from the New York Post regarding Hunter Biden's laptop,' reports Newsweek.

'Taibbi later deleted a tweet showing [former Twitter CEO] Jack Dorsey's email address,' adds the Verge, covering reactions to Taibbi's thread — and the controversial events that the tweets described:
At the time, it was not clear if the materials were genuine, and Twitter decided to ban links to or images of the Post's story, citing its policy on the distribution of hacked materials. The move was controversial even then, primarily among Republicans but also with speech advocates worried about Twitter's decision to block a news outlet. While Musk might be hoping we see documents showing Twitter's (largely former) staffers nefariously deciding to act in a way that helped now-President Joe Biden, the communications mostly show a team debating how to finalize and communicate a difficult moderation decision.

Taibbi himself tweeted that 'Although several sources recalled hearing about a 'general' warning from federal law enforcement that summer about possible foreign hacks, there's no evidence - that I've seen - of any government involvement in the laptop story.'

More from the Verge:
Meanwhile, Taibbi's handling of the emails — which seem to have been handed to him at Musk's direction, though he only refers to 'sources at Twitter' — appears to have exposed personal email addresses for two high-profile leaders: Dorsey and Representative Ro Khanna. An email address that belongs to someone Taibbi identifies as Dorsey is included in one message, in which Dorsey forwards an article Taibbi wrote criticizing Twitter's handling of the Post story. Meanwhile, Khanna confirmed to The Verge that his personal Gmail address is included in another email, in which Khanna reaches out to criticize Twitter's decision to restrict the Post's story as well.

'As the congressman who represents Silicon Valley, I felt Twitter's actions were a violation of First Amendment principles so I raised those concerns,' Khanna said in a statement to The Verge. 'Our democracy can only thrive if we are open to a marketplace of ideas and engaging with people with whom we disagree.'

The story also revealed the names of multiple Twitter employees who were in communications about the moderation decision. While it's not out of line for journalists to report on the involvement of public-facing individuals or major decision makers, that doesn't describe all of the people named in the leaked communications.... 'I don't get why naming names is necessary. Seems dangerous,' Twitter co-founder Biz Stone wrote Friday in apparent reference to the leaks.... The Verge reached out to Taibbi for comment but didn't immediately hear back.

Twitter, which had its communications team dismantled during layoffs last month, also did not respond to a request for comment.

Wired adds:
What did the world learn about Twitter's handling of the incident from the so-called Twitter Files? Not much. After all, Twitter reversed its decision two days later, and then-CEO Jack Dorsey said the moderation decision was 'wrong.'

In other news, 'Twitter will start showing view count for all tweets,' Elon Musk announced Friday, 'just as view count is shown for all videos.' And he shared other insights into his plans for Twitter's future.

'Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom of reach. Negativity should & will get less reach than positivity.'

Read more of this story at Slashdot.